The recent decision by President Biden to resume border wall construction, previously criticized by Democrats, took many by surprise, including allies and those advocating for immigrants.

This unexpected move occurred shortly after top officials from the Biden administration attended an immigration-focused meeting at the Capitol, which included members of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus (CHC) and several immigrant rights activists. Although praised for their participation, the officials never hinted at the forthcoming border wall decision.

Key figures from the CHC expressed their dissatisfaction on Thursday. CHC Chairwoman Nanette Díaz Barragán commented that despite the initial funding being sanctioned under the Trump administration, this move contradicts the present administration’s stance on discontinuing the wall. She emphasized that the Republicans’ insistence on constructing walls is not an efficient use of public funds and poses environmental and humanitarian challenges.

On Wednesday, a notification was published on the Federal Register, explaining that certain environmental and historical preservation rules would be overlooked to proceed with the wall in Starr County, Texas, using the funds set aside in 2019.

When questioned, Biden clarified on Thursday that the decision stemmed from a legal obligation to utilize the funds. He shared his failed efforts to redirect the funds but also stressed that they are legally bound to use it for its intended purpose. As to whether he believes in the wall’s efficacy, Biden responded with a simple “no.”

Details about this decision began to circulate when The Associated Press reported on an understated announcement by the Department of Homeland Security. Some allies, such as Rep. Henry Cuellar, had been pre-informed about the decision, but not all details were shared.

Cuellar voiced concerns about the environmental implications, questioning the reasons for bypassing the environmental laws. An administration spokesperson defended the decision, mentioning the construction would use environmentally friendly methods and that historically, waivers have always been part of the border barrier construction process. They assured the public of their commitment to environmental conservation.

Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas emphasized that the announcement did not represent a shift in policy.

Environmentalists and immigration advocates expressed strong disapproval. Laiken Jordahl, an advocate at the Center for Biological Diversity, criticized the move, highlighting the environmental ramifications in Texas’s Starr County.

The decision also attracted criticism from Republicans and others who have been vocal about Biden’s immigration policies. Former President Trump took to Truth Social to share his views.

Analysts suggest that the administration’s decision might not bring significant improvements to border security. Adam Isacson pointed out that areas rich in biodiversity are less likely to benefit from such barriers.

The controversy surrounding the announcement highlights the administration’s challenge in navigating the intricate political landscape around immigration. Many Democrats fear that inconsistencies in their stance might weaken their public position on immigration.

Democratic strategist Kristian Ramos emphasized the importance of a positive narrative around immigration for Democrats. He differentiated their position from that of the MAGA Republicans.

Amidst these changes, there are speculations about the internal dynamics within the Biden administration. Former Rep. Luis Gutiérrez expressed concerns about the potential negative reception among Latino Biden supporters, predicting both disappointment and anger.